|
Post by gerald on Mar 20, 2015 23:08:32 GMT -5
Interesting on how some of the newer technology is having unwanted side effects. ----------------------------------------------------------- Modern life – a cycle of inadequate exposure to natural light during the day and overexposure to artificial light at night – can mess with the body’s natural sleep pattern. But new lighting may be able to restore the body’s circadian rhythm, the biological mechanism that enables restful sleep, according to UConn Health cancer epidemiologist Richard Stevens, who has been studying the effects of artificial lighting on human health for three decades. “It’s become clear that typical lighting is affecting our physiology,” Stevens says. “We’re learning that better lighting can reduce these physiological effects. By that we mean dimmer and longer wavelengths in the evening, and avoiding the bright blue of e-readers, tablets, and smart phones.” Stevens and co-author Yong Zhu from Yale University explain the known short-term and suspected long-term impacts of circadian disruption in a newly published article published in the British journal Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. “It’s a new analysis and synthesis of what we know up to now on the effect of lighting on our health,” Stevens says. While short-term effects can be seen in sleep patterns, “there’s growing evidence that the long-term implications of this have ties to breast cancer, obesity, diabetes, and depression, and possibly other cancers.” For people, electronic devices emit enough blue light when used in the evening to suppress the sleep-inducing hormone melatonin and disrupt the body’s circadian rhythm. For all life forms – including plants, insects, and animals – excessive lighting of the night sky also has an impact that is just now beginning to be appreciated, say Stevens and Zhu. Yet newer technology is now making it possible to generate, direct, and manage light at night to better accommodate the circadian physiology of life forms in general, the researchers add. Stevens recommends that people become aware of how the type of light emitted from electronic devices affects our biology. He says a recent study comparing people who used e-readers to those who read old-fashioned books in the evening showed a clear difference – the e-readers showed delayed melatonin onset. “It’s about how much light you’re getting in the evening,” Stevens says. “It doesn’t mean you have to turn all the lights off at eight o’clock every night, it just means if you have a choice between an e-reader and a book, the book is less disruptive to your body clock. At night, the better, more circadian-friendly light is dimmer and, believe it or not, redder, like an incandescent bulb.” Stevens was on the scientific panel whose work led to the classification of shift work as a “probable carcinogen” by the International Agency on Cancer Research in 2007. today.uconn.edu/blog/2015/03/lighting-adjustments-necessary-for-better-health-researchers-say/
|
|
|
Post by Deborah on Mar 21, 2015 10:41:29 GMT -5
The reference to incandescent bulbs is interesting. I have to say I like our new cable boxes. The front display can be turned right off, or dimmed - a nice feature.
I have an older e-reader and have no problem getting to sleep using it, or staying asleep. My Ipad, on the other hand - well, let's just say I have to turn it off and put it away before I go to bed or else I am awake much later than I like.
An interesting article. Thanks for posting it, Gerald.
|
|
|
Post by mary57 on Mar 22, 2015 9:15:44 GMT -5
Interesting article, I too have the older e-reader and won't buy one of the fancier ones. Actually Liz's psych made a point of asking her what model e-reader she was using because of the lighting issue and sleep disturbance.
|
|
|
Post by jim on Mar 23, 2015 6:17:19 GMT -5
Thanks for sharing Gerald. thumbsupde1
|
|